I've been meaning to post this for a while, but i was reminded of it tonight when i saw a new one.
The first one aggravates me because of its senselessness. The gist:
Young guy: "Drug money funds terrorism? It's a ploy."
Older guy: "It's a fact."
They go back and forth, with the young guy saying it's a ploy and the older guy saying it's a fact. Yeah, who needs to cite anything even resembling government reports or anything? At least The Truth commercials offer actual facts.
Then in the one i saw tonight, the young guy says that "Drug money might fund terrorism. 'Might' is a moral loophole." The older guy says, "So the money you spend on drugs might..." and he lists off a litany of badness, drug cartels shooting children and terrorists doing things we can't even conceive, etc. So of course i had to play Devil's Advocate and point out that buying anything from any corporation supports slave labor or other sorts of badness. My mother countered that drug money spported worse things, which may be true, i really don't know much about this issue. (And might i add that if you missed the ad early in the campaign, one which i remember only fuzzily from a number of months ago, you would have no clue as to how drug money connects with terrorism.) I countered that if these illegal drugs were legalized, then they wouldn't be suppporting terrorism; they would just be part of the corporate system. "But they're not legal." And thus begins the cyclic argument, so we stopped.