Elizabeth Scripturient (the delinquent, ecumenical (hermionesviolin) wrote,
Elizabeth Scripturient (the delinquent, ecumenical
hermionesviolin

[destined to become a reference librarian]

I have caved.  Due to its appeal as a supplemenatry search function, I have begun tagging my entries.  With 2000+ entries, this will of course take forever.  I did a bunch of recent ones, but obviously it'll make more sense for me to start at the beginning and work my way through.  This also means I'll get everything into Memories (my primary search function).  Oh the joys of coming up with categories (she says sarcastically, because she is detail-oriented and perfectionist and thus spends what some might consider way too much time thinking about such matters).  Concern: the dominant sorting mechanism seems to be category:subcategory.  I validate this, however doing it myself it sometimes feels too squooshed, like I would rather do category: subcategory.  Thoughts?
Tags: future reference librarian, self: lj: tagging
Subscribe
  • Post a new comment

    Error

    default userpic

    Your IP address will be recorded 

    When you submit the form an invisible reCAPTCHA check will be performed.
    You must follow the Privacy Policy and Google Terms of use.
  • 5 comments